Social & Copy Trading

Close, and where it differs the difference is recorded rather than left to be noticed. Copies are placed against the leader’s fill in the same execution path, and slippage is measured per copied trade and shown on the follower’s record. The gaps that remain are mechanical and unavoidable: a follower whose scaled size rounds below the platform minimum, an instrument they excluded, a limit of theirs that had already been reached. Every one of those is logged as a skipped trade with its reason, which is the difference between a client who understands the variance and one who suspects it.

Three ways, chosen per subscription. By equity ratio, so a follower with a fiftieth of the leader’s capital takes a fiftieth of the position and the proportional result matches; by a fixed multiplier, where the follower sets their own aggression relative to the leader; or by a fixed lot, where every copied trade is the same size regardless. Equity ratio is the default because it is the one that keeps percentage returns comparable, which is what the follower is actually buying.

Yes, and the limits are enforced for that follower alone rather than across the book. They can set a maximum drawdown at which copying stops automatically, a maximum lot per trade, a ceiling on total open exposure, and allow or deny lists by instrument — so a follower who does not want crypto copied simply does not get it. When a limit stops a trade or a subscription, the follower is told which limit and when, in their own portal. You can also set house limits above theirs that no follower may exceed.

The follower decides, from their own portal, immediately. They can pause — no new copies, existing positions still managed by the leader; stop and keep, which leaves the open positions in their hands to manage themselves; or close everything now at market. There is no approval step and no waiting period, because a product that makes leaving harder than joining generates complaints first and departures second. Whichever they choose is recorded with the time, which settles any later question about what they asked for.

On risk-adjusted measures rather than last month’s return, and you control the weighting. Return matters, but so do maximum drawdown, consistency across periods, account age and traded volume — because a leader who tripled a small account in three weeks on one instrument is not a better proposition than one who has compounded steadily for two years, and a board that says otherwise will eventually cost you the followers who believed it. Capacity caps per leader stop a popular strategy being oversold past the size it works at.

On profit above each follower’s own high-water mark, over settlement periods you define, split between the leader and the firm on the terms in their agreement. The follower sees the terms before they subscribe and an itemised calculation afterwards; the leader sees their earnings in their own view; and both come out of the same run, so there is nothing to reconcile between them. Fees settle through the same ledger as everything else, which means they appear in reconciliation and reporting like any other movement rather than as a side calculation somebody maintains.